Last Friday, I purchased the extended edition of The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug on Blu Ray. The film itself is expanded by twenty-five minutes of extra footage, plus nine hours of film documentaries spread out over two separate discs. Over the course of about three days, I watched the film and most of the documentaries. And now, I have to say: Smaug is my new favorite character to quote. He’s just so deliciously, wholly and completely a villain, that it’s fascinating and a delight to watch and hear him on screen, and mimic his movements and lines off screen.
Of course, I may have a slight “thing” for Benedict Cumberbatch, who provides Smaug’s melodious voice, but nuance.
What makes a villain so much fun to watch and read about? What weaves the twisted web of the love-to-hate relationship that so many viewers and readers conjure with their favorite bad guy or girl? I’m talking about a specific kind of villain: the one who is thoroughly egotistical, greedy, and arrogant, the one that you just love to watch because he or she is always plotting and planning, ready for anything, pushing your hero or heroine to the limits of their abilities and sanity. It may have to do with the power of their voice or their appearance, for it seems that every villain needs something physically impressive about them in order to make the sell. But I think there is more to the archetype than that, something that lies with the prowess of the mind. There has to be a really intelligent brain behind all the boasting, a conniving, evil mind that can cleverly cut into the thoughts and plots of his enemies and extract all the information he wants, be it through words or magic or simply careful maneuvering. Not only that, but a good villain can play with you, sow doubt and almost, just almost convince you that he is in the right and that you can sympathize with him. As such, he’s not just a step ahead of the competition; he’s on an entirely different playing field, so much so that the heroes have to struggle against seemingly impossible odds to even snag a toehold next to him or her.
Smaug fits into this category of villain in all respects. First of all, his physical attributes are manifold: he’s a magnificently humongous fire-breathing dragon, with a wingspan the size of two 747 jet planes. Smaug describes himself rather well in The Desolation of Smaug when he says, “My teeth are spears! My armor is iron! My wings are a hurricane!” Clearly, he has the advantage over literally every other creature in mentioned in The Hobbit, from trolls to wargs to the Gundabad Orc Azog, himself. Even Sauron dares not assert his all-consuming dominion over the beast, choosing instead to forge an alliance (which you can learn about by watching the extended edition of The Desolation of Smaug). Then, there’s his voice: a powerful mixture of the voice work of Benedict Cumberbatch, and enhancing undertones added by the sound department working on The Hobbit films.
The artists and animators at Weta Digital cannot be overlooked, either, for they are the ones responsible for making the dragon look as real and larger than life as would only do him justice. They also took the personality that Tolkien infused into his lines and Benedict into his voice, and rendered it in a stunning array of animations that give you not only a fire-breathing dragon and impressive enemy, but also a dangerous, intelligent character.
Dragons in Tolkien’s fictional universe have rather special qualities. They are borderline hypnotists, and clever conversationalists. They care about two things: the riches they accumulate and their pride. Smaug is no different; in fact, he is the ultimate personification of this kind of dragon, being that he is the only dragon who plays a principal role in events outside of those told of in Tolkien’s posthumously published work, “The Silmarillion.” He is the master of extracting information, and is able to get under Bilbo Baggins’s skin and find out all the things he needs to know: who is coming to steal from him, how many others there are besides the hobbit thief, etc. Smaug considers himself to be so impressive, in both bodily and mental faculties, that his fatal flaw (a missing scale on a vulnerable spot on his belly) can be deemed both insignificant and impossible to exploit. How many archers could make such a precise shot? Of course, if you’ve read the book, then you know that there is at least one archer who can, but such is the nature of an epic story; the villains always lose, their fatal flaws are always exploited despite the odds piled up against such a seeming impossibility.
Those odds are an important element to a villain, in my opinion. You have to believe that the villain can succeed, even if, deep down, you know or think that they won’t. The stakes have to be high, the victory almost unattainable, because you have to believe in the villain. If you can’t believe in the villain, then the conflict of the story drops and the story is not as worthwhile anymore, because your hero doesn’t have to go above and beyond what they think they can do to defeat their enemies. There is no surprise, no wonder or awe for the audience. The victory is lessened in meaning, and the climax becomes mediocre. When the villain, especially the overblown, egotistical villain that we’re talking about doesn’t have all the necessary elements to make him truly impressive, something is lost to the audience. The villain in that case becomes just another pretender, another cataclysmic failure waiting to implode.
Which is why you need every element that makes a good, decent, wholly evil villain. Smaug has them, which I’ve already mentioned: size, power, cunning. But there is another villain who possesses all of these lovely qualities, and he is worth mentioning. His name is Palpatine.
Emperor Palpatine, that is; also known by his Sith title, Darth Sidious, he, too, represents the epitome of the selfish, greedy, confident villain of the Star Wars universe who is just so much fun to watch. But why? Why is he so much fun to see become victorious, despite the depth and breadth of his evil? In my opinion, it’s partly due to his devious mind. His diabolical plan to conquer the Separatists, thereby uniting most of the galaxy under one government, and overthrow the Jedi Order is astounding in its utter genius, mostly because it succeeds. By the end of Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, Sidious is in complete control. All of his machinations have come to success, and he has every reason to gloat and be satisfied that his victory is all but complete. Not even the great Jedi, Grand Master Yoda can defeat him. Even Luke Skywalker can’t (or at least won’t) defeat him in Return of the Jedi, and Luke is supposed to be the ultimate hero of the original trilogy. Sidious has so many odds in his favor: a powerful apprentice who does his bidding, a Senate that cannot oppose him, legions of Imperial troops at his beck and call, and a planet-destroying super weapon poised and ready to point at whatever world he wishes to annihilate. He does have a fatal flaw, as Luke points out when he says, “Your overconfidence is your weakness,” but this doesn’t become apparent as the fatal flaw until the very last few minutes of Sidious’s life on the second Death Star. This is because the object of his overconfidence is so unlikely to fail him, so seemingly incapable of betraying him at that moment, that he doesn’t even consider him a threat in his final moments.
In Sidious’s mind, there is no way that Darth Vader will betray him on the second Death Star, when Luke is all but dead and the snuffing out of the rebellion imminent. The odds are stacked up against this possibility. The cards have all been played; Sidious will triumph, and Luke Skywalker and all of his friends will die…until Vader changes the game and does the unthinkable: he betrays his master, not out of a desire to usurp the latter and become the next great Sith Master, but out of love for his son. Only when this happens is Sidious defeated. Nothing else would have defeated him so completely. And the odds were stacked against it happening. Which is one of the things makes Sidious so believably a villain, so deliciously evil. He’s so powerful and so in control of all the variables, that the viewer actually begins to believe that he COULD win. Again, it is only when the unthinkable happens that victory against the Dark Lord of the Sith becomes remotely feasible.
I love it when a storyteller can make this kind of villain a success. Villains like Smaug and Sidious are so confident in themselves and their plans, so evil and powerful and in possession of all the factors, that it is only the small things can defeat them. To quote Gandalf, it’s the small everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keep the darkness at bay. The determination of a man to protect his family and his town. The love of a father for his son. Smaug and Sidious are alike in that they are overconfident in themselves and their abilities, and for that reason they are destined to fall. What is telling is that it takes a lot of work on the part of the heroes in order to exploit those fatal flaws and use them to destroy their enemies once and for all. And as soon as great villains are gone, everyone breathes a sigh of relief; that’s how great of an impression they made on their audiences. The challenges they provided for the heroes and for the audiences made for conflict that was satisfying, even heart wrenching, qualities a good cinematic or reading experience should convey.
But, as sick as this may seem to say, they’re such fun to watch while they’re still alive. And that is telling of something else. It proves that their villainy is so well written and so well portrayed, it’s absolutely, almost shamefully fascinating.